May 30

Tomcat vs. Netty: A Deep Dive into Spring Boot and Spring WebFlux Defaults

Tomcat is default embedded server for Spring Boot and Netty is default embedded server for Spring WebFlux

When developing web applications with Spring Boot and Spring WebFlux, you might notice that they use different embedded servers by default:

Tomcat for Spring Boot and Netty for Spring WebFlux.

This raises the question: Why are these choices made, and what are the internal differences between Tomcat and Netty? In this blog post, we'll explore these questions by examining the architectures, threading models, and use cases for both Tomcat and Netty.

Tomcat:

Apache Tomcat is a widely-used web server and servlet container. It’s the default choice for traditional Spring Boot applications due to its robustness, ease of use, and compatibility with the Servlet API.

Key Features

  • Servlet-Based: Tomcat is built around the Servlet API, making it a natural fit for traditional Spring MVC applications.
  • Blocking I/O: Tomcat employs a thread-per-request model, which means each incoming request is handled by a separate thread.
  • Ease of Configuration: Tomcat is simple to set up and configure with Spring Boot, making it ideal for a wide range of web applications.

Internal Architecture

  • Connector: Manages network connections, accepting and processing HTTP requests.
  • Container: Responsible for servlet lifecycle management, including loading, initialization, and invocation.
  • Threading Model: Tomcat uses a thread pool where each request is processed by a separate thread from the pool. This model is straightforward but can lead to scalability issues under high load due to thread contention and memory overhead.

Example Scenario: Handling Parallel Requests

Let's consider a scenario where five parallel requests hit a Tomcat server:

Thread-Per-Request: Tomcat assigns a separate thread to each of the five requests from its thread pool.
Blocking I/O: Each thread processes its request synchronously, blocking if any I/O operations (such as database calls) are required.

Resource Management: If the thread pool has sufficient idle threads, all five requests are processed simultaneously. If not, additional requests will wait in a queue until threads become available.

Advantages:

  • Simple and easy to understand.
  • Well-suited for traditional web applications.
  • Mature and stable with extensive community support.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited scalability under high load due to thread overhead.
  • Higher memory consumption per request.

Netty: 

Netty is a highly performant, asynchronous event-driven network application framework. It’s the default for Spring WebFlux, which is designed for reactive programming.

Key Features

  • Event-Driven: Netty uses an event-driven architecture, making it suitable for handling a large number of simultaneous connections efficiently.
  • Non-Blocking I/O: Netty utilizes non-blocking I/O, allowing it to handle many connections with fewer threads.
  • Scalability: Designed for high concurrency, low latency, and high throughput applications.

Internal Architecture

  • Event Loop: Netty’s core component is the event loop, which manages I/O operations asynchronously. An event loop group contains one or more event loops.
  • Channel: Represents a connection, such as an incoming HTTP request, and is associated with an event loop.
  • Threading Model: Netty uses a small number of threads to handle many connections. Each event loop runs in a single thread and handles multiple channels, making it highly scalable.

Example Scenario: Handling Parallel Requests

Consider a scenario where five parallel requests hit a Netty server:

Event-Driven Model: Netty distributes the five requests across its event loops.
Non-Blocking I/O: Operations do not block the event loop thread. Instead, I/O operations are handled asynchronously, allowing the same thread to manage multiple connections efficiently.

Scalability: Because of its non-blocking nature, Netty can handle a large number of connections with a relatively small number of threads.

Advantages:

  • Highly efficient for I/O-bound tasks.
  • Superior scalability and performance under high concurrency.
  • Ideal for reactive programming and modern web applications.

Disadvantages:

  • More complex to understand and configure.
  • Requires a different programming model (reactive) compared to traditional servlet-based applications.

Why the Defaults?

Spring Boot with Tomcat:

  • Simplicity: Tomcat’s synchronous model is simpler to understand and debug.
  • Compatibility: Well-suited for traditional, blocking-style web applications.
  • Stability: Mature and stable, with extensive community support and documentation.

Spring WebFlux with Netty:

  • Reactive Programming: WebFlux is designed for reactive applications, which benefit from Netty’s non-blocking, event-driven model.
  • Scalability: Netty’s architecture is ideal for applications requiring high concurrency and low latency.
  • Performance: Netty provides better performance under high load, making it suitable for modern, high-performance web applications.

Choosing the Right Server

Tomcat: Ideal for traditional web applications with a straightforward request-response model. If you're building standard Spring MVC applications, Tomcat’s simplicity and robustness make it a great choice.

Netty: Best suited for applications that need to handle a large number of concurrent connections with minimal resource usage. If you're leveraging reactive programming with Spring WebFlux, Netty’s non-blocking I/O and event-driven architecture provide superior performance and scalability.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between Tomcat and Netty helps in making an informed decision about which server to use based on your application’s requirements. Both Tomcat and Netty have their strengths, and choosing the right one can significantly impact your application’s performance and scalability.

Want to maximize your preparation without wasting time?

The Java Spring Boot Interview Revision Kit is a comprehensive mix of Q&As, code examples, videos, timer-based quizzes, and much more. It’s designed to help you cover all the essential topics efficiently and effectively—perfect for busy engineers aiming to ace their next interview!

Link: https://www.hungrycoders.com/course/java-spring-boot-interview-kit-behavioral-strategies

Created with